Skip to main content

Standardized Field Sobriety Tests (SFSTs)

During a DUI traffic stop, officers typically administer a series of Standardized Field Sobriety Tests (SFSTs). These tests were developed by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and are the primary tool officers use to establish probable cause for a DUI arrest. Understanding these tests and their limitations is critical to your defense.

Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN)

The HGN test measures involuntary jerking of the eye as it follows a stimulus (usually a pen or finger) moving horizontally. Officers look for three “clues” in each eye (six total):

  • Lack of smooth pursuit — Does the eye follow the stimulus smoothly or jerkily?
  • Distinct and sustained nystagmus at maximum deviation — Does the eye jerk when held at the far side?
  • Onset of nystagmus prior to 45 degrees — Does the jerking begin before the eye reaches 45 degrees from center?

Limitations: Nystagmus can be caused by many factors besides alcohol, including medications, medical conditions, fatigue, caffeine, nicotine, and even naturally occurring nystagmus. The test must also be administered in strict accordance with NHTSA protocols to be valid.

Walk and Turn (WAT)

This divided attention test requires you to take nine heel-to-toe steps along a straight line, turn in a prescribed manner, and take nine steps back. Officers look for eight possible “clues”:

  1. Cannot keep balance during instructions
  2. Starts too soon
  3. Stops while walking
  4. Does not touch heel-to-toe
  5. Steps off the line
  6. Uses arms for balance
  7. Improper turn
  8. Incorrect number of steps

Limitations: This test is significantly affected by age (over 65), weight (50+ pounds overweight), footwear, road conditions, weather, lighting, medical conditions, and physical disabilities.

One Leg Stand (OLS)

This test requires you to stand on one foot with the other raised approximately six inches off the ground while counting for 30 seconds. Officers look for four “clues”:

  1. Swaying while balancing
  2. Using arms for balance
  3. Hopping
  4. Putting foot down

Limitations: Like the Walk and Turn, this test is affected by age, weight, footwear, road surface, medical conditions, and physical fitness. Many sober individuals cannot perform this test satisfactorily.

22 Factors That Affect Field Sobriety Tests

There are numerous factors that can cause a sober person to fail field sobriety tests:

  1. Age (over 65)
  2. Weight (50+ lbs overweight)
  3. Back, leg, or inner ear problems
  4. Footwear (heels, boots, sandals)
  5. Road surface conditions
  6. Weather conditions
  7. Lighting conditions
  8. Traffic passing nearby
  9. Fatigue or lack of sleep
  10. Nervousness and anxiety
  11. Medical conditions (diabetes, etc.)
  1. Prescription medications
  2. Eye conditions or contacts
  3. Previous injuries
  4. Non-standardized instructions
  5. Officer intimidation
  6. Uneven terrain or slope
  7. Wind or cold temperature
  8. Flashing police lights
  9. Natural lack of coordination
  10. Head trauma or concussion history
  11. Inner ear infections or vertigo

Non-Standardized Tests

Officers sometimes administer non-standardized tests such as the Finger-to-Nose test, Romberg Balance test, Finger Count, or reciting the alphabet. These tests have not been validated by NHTSA and have no established reliability in determining impairment.

NHTSA’s Own Research

According to NHTSA’s own validation studies, even when administered correctly, the three standardized tests combined are only approximately 91% accurate for BAC levels above .08 — meaning nearly 1 in 10 people could be wrongly classified. Individual test accuracy is even lower: HGN 77%, WAT 68%, OLS 65%.

Source Materials & Research

The following NHTSA studies and manuals form the scientific foundation of field sobriety testing. Understanding these materials is critical for challenging FST evidence.

NHTSA SFST Student Manuals (1984–2018)
NHTSA SFST Student Manual – 1984
NHTSA SFST Student Manual – 1987 (V1)
NHTSA SFST Student Manual – 1987 (V2)
NHTSA SFST Student Manual – 1992
NHTSA SFST Student Manual – 1995
NHTSA SFST Student Manual – 2000
NHTSA SFST Student Manual – 2002
NHTSA SFST Student Manual – 2004
NHTSA SFST Student Manual – 2006
NHTSA SFST Student Manual – 2009
NHTSA SFST Student Manual – 2013
NHTSA SFST Student Manual – 2015
NHTSA SFST Student Manual – 2018
Also includes Instructor Guides and Refresher Course materials for 2004, 2008, 2015, and 2018 editions
NHTSA SFST Validation Studies
1977 SFST Validation Study — Original development of the three standardized tests
1983 SFST Field Validation Study — First field study confirming lab results
1995 Colorado Validation Study — Statewide field evaluation of SFST accuracy
1997 Florida Validation Study — Large-scale field validation in Florida
1998 San Diego Validation Study — Urban field study with detailed error analysis
1980 Visual Detection of DWI — Final report on visual cues for detecting impaired drivers
ARIDE & DRE Materials
Advanced Roadside Impaired Driving Enforcement (ARIDE) — Bridge training between SFST and Drug Recognition Expert programs
Drug Evaluation and Classification Program (DECP) Manuals — Protocols for evaluating drug impairment
Arizona DRE Study — State-specific drug recognition data
NHTSA Driving Cues & Detection Guides
Visual Detection of DWI Motorists (DOT HS 808 677) — The 24 driving cues that officers use to identify potentially impaired drivers
Driving Cues Studies — Research supporting the visual detection methodology
These materials define the specific driving behaviors officers are trained to look for. Knowing them is essential for challenging the reason for the traffic stop.

Why These Materials Matter: Officers must follow the NHTSA-standardized procedures exactly as trained. Deviations from the manual — in how tests are administered, demonstrated, or scored — can invalidate the results. A knowledgeable DUI attorney will compare the officer's conduct against these standards.

Source Materials & Research

Working Links to the Original Manuals

Every claim on this site is sourced. These are the canonical manuals, statutes, and procedure documents — direct from the agencies that wrote them.

NHTSA
NHTSA Drunk Driving Hub
NHTSA's landing page for drunk-driving research, statistics, and the regulatory framework that the SFST training is built on.
Visit NHTSA →
NHTSA
NHTSA Drug-Impaired Driving
NHTSA's drug-impaired driving research hub — the same data the DRE program is built on, plus current enforcement priorities.
Visit NHTSA →
NHTSA
SFST Research & Validation
NHTSA's overview page with the foundational SFST validation studies (1977, 1981, San Diego 1998) and current research.
Visit NHTSA →
A.R.S.
A.R.S. § 28-1381 — DUI
The Arizona DUI statute — definitions, BAC thresholds, and the elements the State must prove for every DUI charge.
Read statute →
A.R.S.
A.R.S. § 28-1383 — Aggravated DUI
Aggravated DUI elements — third offense in 84 months, suspended/revoked license, child passenger, ignition-interlock violation.
Read statute →
A.R.S.
A.R.S. § 28-1385 — Admin Per Se
The civil/administrative MVD process — implied consent, the 30-day hearing window, and license-suspension procedures.
Read statute →
IACP / NHTSA
Drug Evaluation & Classification Program
The official DRE (Drug Recognition Expert) program — 12-step protocol, training standards, and the IACP curriculum.
Visit DECP.org →
AZ DPS
AZ DPS Crime Lab
Arizona Department of Public Safety crime lab — blood-draw protocols, gas-chromatography procedures, and chain-of-custody standards.
Visit AZ DPS →
AZ Courts
AZ Courts Self-Service Center
Forms, procedures, and self-help materials from the Arizona Judicial Branch — useful if you're handling part of your case yourself.
Visit AZ Courts →

DUI Defense Resource Network

Scroll to Top